Performance Analysis of Kenyan Microfinance Banks (2019-2023)

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

Based on the provided data set, I’ll analyze the performance of various microfinance institutions in Kenya across different financial metrics for the years 2019-2023.

Profit Before Tax

The overall profitability of the microfinance sector has been declining:

• Total profit before tax decreased from -47 million KSh in 2019 to -2,205 million KSh in 2023.
• Only 5 out of 14 institutions reported a profit in 2023, compared to 6 in 2019.
• BRANCH showed the most significant improvement, moving from a loss of 43 million KSh in 2019 to a profit of 98 million KSh in 2023.
• KWFT experienced the largest decline, from a loss of 525 million KSh in 2019 to a loss of 938 million KSh in 2023.

Return on Assets (ROA)

The sector’s ROA has also been declining:

• Overall ROA decreased from -0.12% in 2019 to -3.68% in 2023.
• BRANCH showed the highest ROA in 2023 at 9.21%, a significant improvement from -12.80% in 2019.
• ONIT had the lowest ROA in 2023 at -50.78%.

Total Assets

The microfinance sector has seen a contraction in total assets:

• Total assets decreased from 75,802 million KSh in 2019 to 63,172 million KSh in 2023.
• KWFT remained the largest institution by assets, despite a decrease from 30,612 million KSh in 2019 to 22,945 million KSh in 2023.
• UMBA had the smallest asset base in 2023 at KSh 141 million.

Return on Equity (ROE)

ROE shows high volatility across institutions:

• The sector’s overall ROE declined from -0.84% in 2019 to -35.07% in 2023.
• UMBA reported an exceptionally high ROE of 825% in 2023, likely due to a very low equity base.
• KWFT had the lowest ROE in 2023 at -96.01%.

Average Cost of Funds

The sector’s average cost of funds has been increasing:

• The overall average cost of funds rose from 5.63% in 2019 to 7.07% in 2023.
• SALAAM consistently maintained the lowest cost of funds, at 0% for most years.
• BRANCH experienced the highest volatility, with costs ranging from 1.77% in 2022 to 12.49% in 2023.

Efficiency Ratio

The efficiency ratio for the sector has worsened:

• The overall efficiency ratio increased from 67.60% in 2019 to 81.88% in 2023, indicating declining efficiency.
• SUMAC consistently maintained the best (lowest) efficiency ratio, ranging from 40.58% to 42.57% over the period.
• UMBA showed extremely poor efficiency, with ratios exceeding 1000% in some years.

Non-Performing Loans (NPL) Provisions to Operating Income

NPL provisions have increased significantly:

• The sector’s overall NPL provisions to operating income rose from 2.42% in 2019 to 9.47% in 2023.
• CHOICE experienced a dramatic increase, reaching 2205.92% in 2023.
• SALAAM maintained the lowest ratio, with 0% in most years.

Total Non-Performing Loans to Total Advances

The NPL ratio has worsened considerably:

• The sector’s overall NPL to total advances ratio increased from 21.31% in 2019 to 33.32% in 2023.
• CHOICE showed an alarming NPL ratio of 2205.92% in 2023.
• SALAAM and U & I consistently maintained the lowest NPL ratios.

Core Capital to Total Deposit Liabilities

This ratio indicates the financial strength and stability of the MFBs:

• Muungano showed the highest ratio in 2023 at 162.19%, a significant improvement from 0% in 2022.
• LOLC, Salaam, and U & I also demonstrated strong ratios above 60% in 2023.
• UMBA had the lowest ratio at -121.88% in 2023, indicating severe financial distress.
• The overall sector ratio improved slightly from 14.11% in 2022 to 15.16% in 2023.

Non-Performing Loans to Total Advances

This ratio reflects the quality of the loan portfolio:

• Choice had an alarmingly high ratio of 2205.92% in 2023, indicating severe credit quality issues.
• Salaam and ON IT showed the best performance with 0% and 3.85% respectively in 2023.
• The overall sector ratio worsened slightly from 33.04% in 2022 to 33.32% in 2023.

Liquidity Ratio

This measure indicates the MFBs’ ability to meet short-term obligations:

• Choice led with a liquidity ratio of 160.93% in 2023, followed closely by Salaam at 151.28%.
• KWFT had the lowest liquidity ratio at 19.67% in 2023.
• The overall sector liquidity decreased from 38.57% in 2022 to 32.50% in 2023.

Overall Ranking

Our overall ranking of MFBs based on the parameters cited above is as follows:

1. U & I maintained its top position in both 2022 and 2023.
2. Muungano made a significant leap from 9th in 2022 to 2nd in 2023.
3. Caritas held steady at 3rd place in both years.
4. UMBA consistently ranked at the bottom in both years.

Key Observations

1. Volatility: Some MFBs show extreme fluctuations in their ratios year-over-year, suggesting instability or significant structural changes.

2. Sector Health: The overall sector shows mixed performance, with slight improvements in core capital ratio but declines in liquidity and marginal worsening of non-performing loans.

3. Top Performers: U & I, Muungano, and Caritas consistently rank high across multiple indicators.

4. Struggling Institutions: UMBA, Choice, and Rafiki show concerning trends across various metrics.

5. Emerging Players: Muungano’s rapid rise in rankings and strong financial ratios in 2023 indicate it as an emerging strong player in the sector.

This analysis provides a snapshot of the Kenyan microfinance banking sector, highlighting both strengths and areas of concern among the various institutions.

Key Observations

1. Sector-wide challenges: The microfinance sector in Kenya is facing significant profitability issues, with declining ROA and ROE.
2. Asset contraction: The overall reduction in total assets suggests a shrinking of the sector, possibly due to economic challenges or regulatory changes.
3. Varied performance: While most institutions are struggling, some like BRANCH and U & I have shown improvements in profitability and returns.
4. Volatility: The high variability in ROE, particularly for smaller institutions, indicates potential instability in the sector.

• Market leaders: KWFT and FAULU remain the largest institutions by assets, but both are facing profitability challenges.
• Increasing Costs: The rising average cost of funds suggests that institutions are facing higher financing costs, potentially due to increased perceived risk or tightening monetary policies.
• Declining Efficiency: The worsening efficiency ratio indicates that operating expenses are growing faster than operating income, suggesting potential management issues or increased regulatory costs.
• Deteriorating Loan Quality: The significant increase in NPL ratios and provisions indicates a severe decline in loan quality across the sector, which could be due to economic challenges or poor credit risk management.
• High Variability: There’s substantial variation in performance across institutions, with some maintaining relatively stable metrics while others show extreme volatility.
• Outliers: Institutions like CHOICE and UMBA show extremely poor performance in certain metrics, which may indicate severe operational or financial difficulties.
• Resilient Performers: SALAAM and U & I consistently perform well across multiple metrics, suggesting more robust business models or risk management practices.

This analysis reveals that the Kenyan microfinance sector is facing significant challenges, with most institutions struggling to maintain profitability and growth. Deteriorating efficiency and loan quality are a primary concerns. The high variability in performance across institutions suggests that some business models are more resilient than others in the face of these sector-wide challenges. Further investigation into the specific strategies of better-performing institutions could provide valuable insights for the sector’s improvement.